Analyzing Moors & Cabot Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison: Changes in Shares and Values Highlight Dynamic Nature of Investment Portfolios
Ava Hoppe | 21 April, 2023
In the world of finance, holdings and investments are constantly changing. One quarter can see a significant shift in a fund's portfolio, and the Moors & Cabot, Inc. Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison is a perfect example of this.
The report, which compares the third and fourth quarters of 2022, shows changes in holdings and values for a number of different companies. Some companies saw an increase in shares and value, while others experienced a decrease. Let's take a closer look at some of the changes that occurred.
First on the list is Apple Inc. (AAPL), which saw a decrease in shares from 469,060 to 450,171, and a decrease in value from $64,824,000 to $58,490,000, a decrease of 9.8%. While this may be concerning for some investors, it's important to note that Apple is still the largest holding in the portfolio, making up 9.54% of the total portfolio value.
Moving on to another tech giant, Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), we see a much smaller change in holdings. The number of shares decreased slightly from 219,244 to 218,059, but the value increased from $51,062,000 to $52,294,000, a small increase of 2.4%.
Procter and Gamble Co. (PG) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) also saw slight decreases in shares and increases in value. P&G's shares decreased from 144,776 to 143,111, while the value increased from $18,278,000 to $21,689,000, an increase of 18.7%. J&J's shares decreased from 123,520 to 121,583, while the value increased from $20,178,000 to $21,477,000, an increase of 6.4%.
Some companies experienced more significant changes. For example, Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) saw a decrease in shares from 25,635 to 23,980, but an increase in value from $45,560,000 to $56,215,000, a significant increase of 23.4%. This highlights the fact that changes in shares don't always necessarily equate to changes in value.
Similarly, Chevron Corp (CVX) saw a large increase in value from $14,070,000 to $18,092,000, an increase of 28.6%, despite only a small increase in shares from 97,930 to 100,799.
Another interesting company to note is Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN). While the number of shares held by the fund decreased significantly from 198,638 to 186,234, the value decreased even more drastically from $22,446,000 to $15,643,000, a decrease of 30.3%. This could be seen as a bearish outlook on the company by the fund, but again, it's important to consider the changing market conditions and the fund's overall strategy.
On the other hand, there were some companies that saw significant increases in both shares and value. Merck & Co Inc. (MRK) saw an increase in shares from 147,497 to 150,887, and an increase in value from $12,702,000 to $16,740,000, a jump of 31.8%. Meanwhile, Union Pacific Corp (UNP) saw an increase in shares from 26,580 to 24,454, and an increase in value from $5,178,000 to $5,063,000, a modest increase of 2.2%.
Lastly, it's worth mentioning the ETF that was included in the report, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF TR (SPY). This ETF saw a massive increase in both shares and value, with shares increasing from 12,586 to 22,561, and the value jumping from $4,496,000 to $8,627,000, an increase of 91.9%. This could indicate a strategy shift by the fund towards a more passive approach and exposure to the overall market.
In conclusion, the Moors & Cabot, Inc. Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison clearly shows the dynamic nature of investment portfolios. Changes in shares and value can be caused by a variety of factors, including market conditions, company performance, and strategy shifts. As always, it's important for investors to closely monitor and analyze these changes in order to make informed decisions about their own portfolios.
Other Posts
- Pier 88 Investment Partners LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison
- The Rise and Fall of Anderson Hoagland & Co: A Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Oberson’s and Dyna-Mist Join Trinity Hunt Partners’ Commercial Landscaping Platform, Visterra
- A Closer Look at Global Thematic Partners' Q1 2020 vs. Q2 2020 13F Holdings Comparison
- Exploring the Winds of Change: Quattro Financial Advisors' Investment Shifts from Q4 2023 to Q1 2024
- Comparing Advisory Services Network, LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings: Who's Buying and Selling?
- Atwood & Palmer Inc Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Kovack Advisors, Inc. Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Kingsley Gate: Unlocking the Power of Decision-Making in Executive Hiring
- Orbimed Advisors LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022: An In-Depth Comparison of 13F Holdings