DeGreen Capital Management LLC Q2 2021 vs. Q3 2021 13F Holdings Review
Ava Hoppe | 4 May, 2023
DeGreen Capital Management LLC, a reputable investment management firm, recently released its Q3 13F filings, detailing the company's shifts in holdings and securities. The Q2 2021 vs. Q3 2021 comparison offers an exciting insight into the company's investment strategies and the current state of the market.
SPDR State Street Global and Vanguard Funds Remain Firm Favorites
The comparison shows that DeGreen Capital Management LLC has maintained significant holdings in two respective exchange-traded funds: SPDR State Street Global and Vanguard. The latter experienced a 5.7% increase in shares from Q2 to Q3, while the former saw a 1.5% bump.
One notable change is the reduction of holdings in Deutsche Asset Management's VOO. From the Q2 report, VOO saw a decrease of 8.6% in shares, which translates to a reduced valuation of $2,229 when both quarters' data are compared.
WisdomTree's XSOE Big Increase in Shareholdings
However, a notable increase in DeGreen Capital Management LLC's shareholdings is WisdomTree's XSOE, which saw a 44.1% incline in shares. The ETF tracks high dividend-paying companies relative to other companies in emerging markets.
SPDR State Street Global's FLRN and FLOT See Impressive Growth
Another exciting revelation from the report is the remarkable surge in holdings for single fund families, specifically the SPDR State Street Global's FLRN and FLOT. The two funds saw a 125.7% and 108.1% increase in shares, respectively. Both funds are ideal for investors seeking floating-rate securities and Treasury bonds.
Van Eck's SJNK Gets Hammered in Q3 2021
Nonetheless, not all holdings fared well, with Van Eck's SJNK plummeting over 50% in both shares and valuation. The sell-off highlights investors losing interest in the ETF, which tracks the dollar-denominated high yield bonds issued in the US.
Closing thoughts
DeGreen Capital Management LLC's Q2 2021 vs. Q3 2021 13F holdings comparison provides insight into the changing trends and market outlook that can help investors make informed decisions. It is crucial to note that these changes do not signal a lack of profitability in any of the funds or issuers mentioned here, but rather reflect the shifting market and investment objectives. Both seasoned and amateur investors alike should use this report to inform decisions they make regarding securities.
Other Posts
- A Comparative Analysis of Fairbanks Capital Management's Q3 2022 vs Q4 2022 13F Holdings
- Marietta Wealth Management, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- 1834 Investment Advisors Co Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- The Future of Liquid Measurement: One Equity Partners to Acquire TechnipFMC's Measurement Solutions Business
- The Rise and Fall of Q4 2022-Q1 2023 Holdings: MCIA Inc 13F Comparison
- HHR Asset Management's Q1 2022 vs Q2 2022 13F Holdings Comparison: Top Winners and Losers
- Selz Capital LLC Q3 2019 vs. Q4 2019: A Look at the Changing Holdings of Investment Funds
- Wealth Advisors of Tampa Bay: A Look at Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 Investments
- Weathering the Storm: Fortis Advisors' Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Analysing CI Global Investments Inc.'s Q2 2018 vs. Q3 2018 13F Holdings