Summit Financial Group, Inc. Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023: A Comprehensive Analysis of 13F Holdings Comparison
Ava Hoppe | 2 November, 2023
Investing in the stock market requires careful analysis of various factors. One important aspect is understanding the holdings of different funds and how they change over time. In this article, we will examine the Q2 2023 and Q3 2023 13F holdings comparison for Summit Financial Group, Inc. We will delve into the details of the top holdings, their value, and the percentage change.
Let's begin by exploring the top holdings and the changes in their share count and value:
1. MICROSOFT CORP (MSFT):
- Q2 2023 (Shares): 30,745
- Q3 2023 (Shares): 30,305
- Q2 2023 Value ($000): 10,469
- Q3 2023 Value ($000): 9,568
- Percentage Change: -8.6%
2. SPDR S&P 500 ETF TR (SPY):
- Q2 2023 (Shares): 19,498
- Q3 2023 (Shares): 19,789
- Q2 2023 Value ($000): 8,643
- Q3 2023 Value ($000): 8,459
- Percentage Change: -2.1%
3. INVESCO EXCHANGE TRADED FD T (RSP):
- Q2 2023 (Shares): 50,113
- Q3 2023 (Shares): 49,488
- Q2 2023 Value ($000): 7,498
- Q3 2023 Value ($000): 7,011
- Percentage Change: -6.5%
4. ISHARES TR (IJR):
- Q2 2023 (Shares): 67,097
- Q3 2023 (Shares): 67,037
- Q2 2023 Value ($000): 6,686
- Q3 2023 Value ($000): 6,323
- Percentage Change: -5.4%
5. PROCTER AND GAMBLE CO (PG):
- Q2 2023 (Shares): 43,595
- Q3 2023 (Shares): 42,980
- Q2 2023 Value ($000): 6,615
- Q3 2023 Value ($000): 6,269
- Percentage Change: -5.2%
From the data above, we can observe some interesting trends. Microsoft Corp (MSFT) remains the top holding, but there was a slight decrease in share count and value. The same goes for other major holdings like SPDR S&P 500 ETF TR (SPY) and INVESCO EXCHANGE TRADED FD T (RSP), which experienced minor decreases in both share count and value.
It's worth noting that LILLY ELI & CO (LLY) saw an increase in both share count and value, with a significant rise of 14.5% in Q3 2023. Another notable change can be seen in EXXON MOBIL CORP (XOM), where the share count increased by 8.8%, leading to a 19.3% increase in value.
On the other hand, some holdings experienced a decrease in both share count and value. For instance, JOHNSON & JOHNSON (JNJ) saw a decrease of 7.9% in their share count, resulting in an 8.5% decline in value. APPLE INC (AAPL) also experienced a decline of 15.6% in share count and a 16.6% decrease in value.
Overall, the Q2 2023 and Q3 2023 13F holdings comparison for Summit Financial Group, Inc. reflects a mix of ups and downs in different holdings. It's important to understand these changes in order to make informed investment decisions. However, it's crucial to remember that 13F holdings only provide a snapshot of a fund's holdings at a particular point in time and may not represent their entire investment strategy.
In conclusion, studying the changes in 13F holdings can provide valuable insights into the investment decisions made by funds. By analyzing the top holdings and their variations in share count and value, investors can gain a better understanding of market trends and potential investment opportunities. Remember to always conduct thorough research and consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Other Posts
- Shah Capital Management Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Navigating the Investment Seas: Guild Investment Management's Strategy Shifts from Q4 2023 to Q1 2024
- A Symphony of Bytes: How SER's Tech Ballet Wooed the Giants of Private Equity
- Navigating the Ebb and Flow: Valeo Financial Advisors' Portfolio Shifts Unveiled
- Syntal Capital Partners' Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023: Analyzing Their Top Stock Holdings
- Butensky & Cohen Financial Security, Inc Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023: A Comprehensive Analysis of Holdings Comparison
- Navigating Shifts in Investment Lands: Red Cedar's Strategic Moves from Q4 2023 to Q1 2024
- Creative Title: Tech Fund's Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022: Winners, Losers & Surprises
- Neville Rodie & Shaw Inc Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Edmonds Duncan Registered Investment Advisors, LLC Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison