The Rise and Fall: Buckingham Capital Management's Q2 and Q3 13F Holdings
Ava Hoppe | 6 May, 2023
The 13F filings are a window into the activity of institutional investors, revealing their investment strategies and portfolio changes. Among the many investors that submit their 13F filings, Buckingham Capital Management Inc. stands as one of the most prominent names.
Looking into Buckingham Capital Management Inc Q2 2020 vs. Q3 2020 13F holdings comparison, we can see significant changes in the firm's investment decisions and asset allocation.
In Q3 2020, Buckingham Capital Management Inc. held positions in more than 200 companies, with a total value of over $2.3 billion. This is a considerable decrease from the previous quarter, where the firm held positions in over 230 companies valued at $2.8 billion.
One of the most significant changes in the firm's portfolio was its position in Apple Inc. In Q2 2020, the firm held over 239,000 shares of the tech giant, valued at $54.2 million. However, in Q3 2020, the firm did not hold any shares of the company.
Other notable changes in Buckingham Capital Management Inc.'s holdings include a significant increase in its position in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. In Q2 2020, the firm held over 154,000 shares of the investment banking company, valued at $33.3 million. In Q3 2020, the firm increased its position to over 318,000 shares, valued at $70 million.
The firm also made changes to its position in Amazon.com Inc. In Q2 2020, the firm held over 23,000 shares of the e-commerce giant, valued at $50.2 million. However, in Q3 2020, the firm reduced its position to just over 2,000 shares, valued at $6 million.
Another notable change in the firm's portfolio was its increased position in Facebook Inc. In Q2 2020, the firm held over 145,000 shares of the social media giant, valued at $28.9 million. In Q3 2020, the firm increased its position to over 218,000 shares, valued at $47.1 million.
Overall, Buckingham Capital Management Inc.'s Q2 2020 vs. Q3 2020 13F holdings comparison shows significant changes in the firm's investment decisions. While the firm reduced its positions in some companies, it also increased them in others, showcasing its active approach to investing.
Other Posts
- Kovack Advisors, Inc. Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Divisar Capital Management LLC's Q3 vs. Q4 2022 Holdings: Which Stocks Took a Hit?
- The Profound Shifts in Pring Turner Capital Group's Portfolio: Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022
- Capital Impact Advisors' Q3 2022 vs. Q4: Check Out the Latest Holdings Changes
- The Rise and Fall: Analyzing HBK Sorce Advisory LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings
- Deltec Asset Management LLC Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Santori & Peters, Inc. Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Gmt Capital Corp Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022: A Comprehensive Comparison of the Top Stock Holdings
- First Command Advisory Services, Inc. Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Unveiling Patterns: A Deep Dive Into Keel Point, LLC's Portfolio Shifts from Late 2023 to Early 2024