The Rise and Fall of Ironsides Partners LLC Q2 2018 vs. Q3 2018 Holdings
Ava Hoppe | 27 April, 2023
In the ever-changing world of finance and investments, it's important to keep a close eye on the movements of major players in the game. Ironsides Partners LLC is one such player, and their Q2 2018 vs. Q3 2018 holdings comparison provides an interesting insight into their recent changes. Let's take a closer look at the numbers and what they mean.
First off, we see a noticeable decrease in the value of Ironsides' holdings from Q2 to Q3 of this year. The total value dropped from $51,014,000 to $22,811,000, a decrease of 55.2%. This could indicate a variety of things, such as a shift in their investment strategy, or simply a sell-off of certain assets.
One notable change in holdings comes from Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Ironsides held 970,0666 shares in Q2, which dropped slightly to 965,0666 in Q3. The more significant change, however, comes in the form of the value of those shares. In Q2, the value was recorded at $18,334,000, dropping to $16,889,000 in Q3. This represents a 7.9% decrease, which could reflect a shift in Ironsides' confidence in the company's future prospects.
Another interesting change comes from Star Bulk Carriers Corp (SBLK). In Q2, Ironsides did not hold any shares in the company. In Q3, however, they acquired 407,452 shares, valuing at $5,888,000. This sudden acquisition could indicate a belief in the company's potential for growth.
Some significant losses were also seen from Ares Cap Corp (ARCC), Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU), Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDS.B), Ensco PLC (VALPQ), Triangle Cap Corp (TCAP), Columbia Finl Inc (CLBK), and Capital Product Partners L.P. (CPLP). Notably, Ironsides sold off all their shares of ARCC and BTU, indicating a complete loss of confidence in these companies.
Overall, while the dip in Ironsides' overall holdings value is concerning, the introduction of some promising new assets does provide some hope for the future. It's worth keeping a close eye on how these changes develop and whether they lead to a strong comeback for Ironsides.
In conclusion, the Q2 vs. Q3 holdings comparison for Ironsides Partners LLC provides some intriguing insights into their recent investment movements. While there are some causes for concern, such as the significant decrease in total holdings value, there are also some promising signs, such as the investment in SBLK. As always, it will be important to stay attentive to how these changes play out in the future.
Other Posts
- Wynnchurch Capital Exits Midland Industries
- A Deep Dive into Lattice Strategies LLC Q4 2018 vs. Q1 2019 13F Holdings Comparison
- Stairway Partners, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison: Major Shifts in Global Market ETFs
- ESP Associates Names Dave Dickey as Chief Executive Officer
- Smith & Howard Wealth Management, LLC Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023: A Comprehensive Analysis of 13F Holdings
- PFM Health Sciences: Holdings Comparison Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022
- Pet Resort Hospitality Group Expands with Five Acquisitions of Leading Pet Resort Brands
- Analyzing the 13F Holdings Comparison Report: Washington Capital Management, Inc Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023
- The Shifts and Trends in Wealth: A Look into Cliftonlarsonallen Wealth Advisors' Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Analyzing Camarda Financial Advisors' Q3-Q4 2022 13F Holdings: A Closer Look at Changes in Investments