The Rise and Fall of Veritas Asset Management LLP's Q3 and Q4 2022 Fund Holdings
Ava Hoppe | 2 May, 2023
Veritas Asset Management LLP, a global investment management firm, has experienced significant changes in their holdings between Q3 and Q4 2022. While some companies saw an increase in shares, others experienced a decline. In this article, we will take a closer look at these changes and analyze what they mean for Veritas Asset Management LLP and the companies in which they invested.
Starting with the positive changes, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) saw a 2.7% increase in the number of shares held by Veritas Asset Management LLP. Microsoft Corp (MSFT) had the biggest positive change with a 37.8% increase, while Mastercard Incorporated (MA) had a 44.3% increase, and Canadian Pac Ry Ltd (CP.TO) had an 8.6% increase. Charter Communications Inc N (CHTR) also saw a 10.3% increase in shares held by Veritas Asset Management LLP.
However, not all companies saw positive changes. Fiserv Inc (FISV) experienced the biggest negative change with a 14.6% decrease in the number of shares held by the investment management firm. Meanwhile, CVS Health Corp (CVS) had a 15% decrease, and Meta Platforms Inc (META) had a staggering 44.3% decrease in shares held.
Other companies that experienced a negative change include The Cooper Companies Inc (COO) with a 27.7% decline, and Amazon Com Inc (AMZN) with an 11.1% decrease. UnitedHealth Group Inc (UNH) and Becton Dickinson & Co (BDX) both saw a small decline of -10.5% and -1.8%, respectively.
As for the smaller companies, Veritas Asset Management LLP acquired 1761000 shares of Pinduoduo Inc (0A2S.IL) in Q4 2022 after having no shares in Q3. Meanwhile, Baxter Intl Inc (BAX), Embecta Corp (EMBC), Netflix Inc (NFLX), and Corteva Inc (CTVA) all saw a 100% decrease in shares held by the investment management firm.
In summary, Veritas Asset Management LLP saw a mix of both positive and negative changes in their Q3 and Q4 2022 holdings. While some companies experienced an increase in shares held, others were not as fortunate. It is essential to note, however, that many factors can influence these investments, and they are subject to change in the future.
Other Posts
- Tarbox Family Office, Inc. Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023: Analyzing Changes in Holdings
- PharmAlliance and CHEORS Tie the Knot: A Marriage Set to Revolutionize Pharma Landscape
- Comparing EMS Capital LP Q3 2021 vs. Q4 2021 13F Holdings: Which Stocks Have Changed Hands?
- The Top Changes in Grimes & Company, Inc.'s Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings
- Signature Wealth Management Group Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Edgewood Management Reveals Significant Changes in Holdings in Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023
- Bridging Growth and Sustainability: Adenia's $470M Fund Lights Up African Investment Landscape
- Castle Rock Wealth Management, LLC Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Unveiling Avondale Wealth Management's Strategy Shift: A Deep Dive into Q4 2023 vs. Q1 2024 Holdings
- Investment Fund Adjustments: Analyzing MYDA Advisors LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022