Darwin Wealth Management's 13F Holdings: Interesting Portfolio Changes in Q3 and Q4 2022
Ava Hoppe | 18 April, 2023
The end of the year is often marked by a flurry of changes in investment portfolios, and this year is no exception. Investment management firm Darwin Wealth Management, LLC recently released its Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F holdings comparison, which shows some interesting shifts in holdings over the past few months. Let’s take a closer look at the data.
First off, let’s discuss the sheer amount of data provided in this comparison. There are 53 different holdings listed, each with data on the number of shares held in Q3 2022 and Q4 2022, as well as the value of those holdings in thousands of dollars. In addition, there’s a column showing the percentage change in holdings from the third quarter to the fourth quarter of the year. It’s a lot to take in, but we’ll try to break it down as best we can.
Overall, the comparison shows that there were both gains and losses in holdings over the past few months. Some of the biggest winners in the portfolio include LMBS, XLV, PHDG, and HD, all of which saw percentage gains of 50% or higher. LMBS in particular saw a massive increase in the number of shares held, going from 171,524 in Q3 to 271,936 in Q4, an increase of 62.2%. The value of those holdings also increased significantly, from $8,048,000 to $13,052,000.
On the other hand, there were several holdings that saw significant losses over the same period. The biggest percentage loss was in CMCSA, which saw the number of shares held drop from 77,895 in Q3 to just 34,701 in Q4, a decrease of 43.7%. The value of those holdings dropped accordingly, from $2,401,000 to just $1,350,000. Other significant losses were seen in XLK, FTGC, and XLY, all of which saw double-digit percentage decreases in holdings.
One of the most interesting things about the comparison is the number of holdings that saw relatively little change from Q3 to Q4. In fact, over half of the holdings listed (28 out of 53) saw a change in holdings of less than 10%. This suggests that the investment managers at Darwin Wealth Management are relatively stable in their investment strategy, and aren’t making dramatic changes to their portfolio on a regular basis.
That said, there were a few holdings that saw moderate changes, with percentage changes in the range of 10-20%. These include AFIF, SRLN, and IWY, all of which saw decreases in holdings of around 10%, as well as AAPL, EFA, and IJR, which saw increases in holdings of similar magnitude.
So, what can we take away from all of this data? One thing that stands out is the importance of diversification in a well-managed investment portfolio. With so many holdings showing relatively little change from quarter to quarter, it’s clear that Darwin Wealth Management is making an effort to spread investments across a variety of assets, rather than making big bets on individual holdings.
It’s also worth noting that, despite the fluctuations in holdings over the past few months, most of the investments in the portfolio have remained relatively stable in terms of value. This suggests that the investment managers are making careful, strategic decisions about when to increase or decrease holdings, rather than making drastic changes based on short-term trends.
All in all, the Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F holdings comparison from Darwin Wealth Management provides a fascinating look at the inner workings of an investment portfolio. While there were certainly some notable gains and losses over the past few months, the overall stability of the portfolio suggests that the investment managers are taking a thoughtful, long-term approach to managing their clients’ assets. For investors looking to build a diversified, balanced portfolio, this serves as a useful reminder of the importance of strategic decision-making and a steady hand.
Other Posts
- Unveiling Q1 2024 Portfolio Shifts: Dudley & Shanley, Inc.'s Strategic Market Moves
- Benchmark Financial Wealth Advisors, LLC Q4 2022 vs Q1 2023: A Tale of Changing Holdings
- Agape Care Group Expands Its Presence in Alabama and Georgia With the Acquisitions of Hope Hospice and Assured Hospice
- The Evolution of 683 Capital Management, LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison
- New Potomac Partners, LLC Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023: An Overview of Fund Holdings
- **Talent Transformation Tale: The Stephens Group's Strategic Move with Katrinka Shields**
- Stairway Partners, LLC Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Parkside Advisors LLC Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Cornell Pochily Investment Advisors, Inc. Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Spinnaker Trust's Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison: Major Changes, Top Gainers and Losers, and Factors Driving Performance