Shaker Financial Services' Funds: A Look at Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 Holdings
Ava Hoppe | 23 April, 2023
Shaker Financial Services, LLC recently released its Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F holdings comparison for its funds, revealing significant changes from one quarter to the next. The findings show a diverse range of holdings, options, and values that provide insight into the financial strategies and performance of Shaker Financial Services' funds.
One fund that saw a notable increase in holdings was FFA, with an impressive 559,371 shares in Q4 2022 compared to 517,265 shares in Q3 2022. This represents an increase in value from $7,599,000 to $8,815,000, a percentage change of 16%. Another fund that saw significant growth in holdings was RVT, with an increase of 814.8%. Its holdings increased from 58,000 to 502,250 shares, with its Q3 2022 value of $728,000 increasing to $6,659,000 in Q4 2022.
Despite some notable increases, other Shaker Financial Services' funds saw a decrease in holdings. One of the largest decreases was seen in NFJ, which showed a decrease of 37.3% in share value from Q3 2022 to Q4 2022. Its holdings decreased from 674,724 shares to 399,655 shares, with a decrease in value from $7,206,000 to $4,514,000 over the same period.
BIF, on the other hand, saw an increase in its holdings of 39.9%, with a Q3 2022 share value of 365,111 increasing to 437,441 in Q4 2022. Its value also saw a substantial increase, from $3,972,000 in Q3 2022 to $5,555,000 in Q4 2022.
Some of the other funds that experienced increases in holdings over the two quarters were CPZ (57.8%), ETW (2921.4%), ASG (1277.7%), and HNW (32.8%). There were also several funds that decreased in holdings over the same period, such as CII (-41.3%), SOR (-54.1%), and DIAX (-54%).
In conclusion, it's clear from the Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F holdings comparison that Shaker Financial Services' funds have had both ups and downs with regards to their holdings. The increases and decreases in holdings and values offer valuable insights into the performance and strategies of these funds, which can be useful for both the management team and investors.
Other Posts
- The Changing Landscape of Appleton Group's Holdings: Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022
- Advisory Research Inc Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022: A Comparison of 13F Holdings
- Landmark Financial Advisors, LLC Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- David Panton Global Private Equity Expert Joins CEA’s Advisory Board
- Arthur M. Cohen & Associates, LLC Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Mountaingate Capital Partners with Damotech and Mac Rak to Lead the Rack Safety Industry
- The Dramatic Shift in Turim 21 Investimentos Ltda.'s Q3 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings
- The Rise and Fall of Rutabaga Capital Management LLC/Ma Q2 2022 vs. Q3 2022 Holdings Comparison
- Harvey Investment Co LLC Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Empowering the Future of Deep Observability: Gigamon's Strategic Leap with Siris