Analyzing Strategic Financial Services' Q3 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison: Top and Worst Performing Securities
Ava Hoppe | 23 April, 2023
The world of finance and investing can be a minefield for even the most experienced investors. Keeping track of a portfolio of stocks, bonds, and other securities can be a daunting task, but with the help of quarterly 13F filings, investors can stay ahead of the curve.
Strategic Financial Services, Inc's Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison reveals some interesting insights into the performance of different securities during this period. In this blog post, we'll take a closer look at the changes in holdings of this fund, examining the top performers, worst performers, and what could have caused these changes.
Top Performers
The best-performing securities in this fund were VLUE, VFMO, and VWOB. VLUE, an iShares ETF, saw a 29.3% increase in shares, from 318,103 to 369,332. Its value also rose from $26,040,000 in Q3 to $33,660,000 in Q4, representing a 29.3% increase. VFMO, a Vanguard fund, saw an increase in shares from 236,318 to 252,290 and an increase in value from $24,994,000 to $28,776,000, or 15.1%. VWOB, another Vanguard fund, saw an increase in shares from 197,709 to 313,474 and an increase in value from $11,366,000 to $19,115,000 or 68.2%.
These funds represent strong performers over the period in part due to the overall strong market conditions of Q4 2022. Investors were buoyed by the post-pandemic economic recovery, leading to an increase in consumer confidence and higher stock prices. Additionally, there was a significant amount of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve Board (Fed) which increased the money supply in circulation in the economy, creating additional demand for stocks.
Worst Performers
The poorest performing securities in the fund were GVI, GSLC, and TSLA. GVI, an iShares fund, saw a decrease in shares from 1,007,220 to 801,968 and a decrease in value from $102,424,000 to $82,169,000, or -19.8%. GSLC, a Goldman Sachs ETF, saw a decrease in shares from 159,365 to 123,088 and a decrease in value from $11,318,000 to $9,370,000, or -17.2%. Finally, TSLA, the well-known electric vehicle maker, saw a decrease in shares from 6,918 to 7,078 and a decrease in value from $1,835,000 to $871,000, or -52.5%.
The decrease in demand for GVI and GSLC appears to be a result of investors taking profits out of these funds as conditions in the market were not as favorable as in previous quarters. TSLA's poor performance can be attributed to a series of factors, but most notably on Chip Shortage that hit vehicle manufacturers globally. With the company's production significantly lower, the demand for its shares also decreased.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Strategic Financial Services, Inc's Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison offers us insights into the performance of different securities within this investment fund. The period was characterized by some securities performing exceptionally well, while others saw their value decrease. The overall strength of the market and quantitative easing implemented by the Federal Reserve Bank were the primary drivers behind the growth in some funds.
It is essential to note that past performance of securities is not always indicative of future results. Investors should always do detailed research on securities and their underlying assets before investing. Additionally, it is crucial to have a well-diversified portfolio to mitigate risks effectively. With this in mind, Strategic Financial Services' 13F Highlights Comparison offers an excellent starting point in analyzing the securities and their behaviors.
Other Posts
- The Evolution of Newtyn Management's Holdings: Comparing Q3 2022 to Q4 2022
- Private Wealth Group, LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison: Analyzing the Shifts in Investments
- Vista Private Wealth Partners. LLC Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Navigating the Waves of Investment: A Strategic Overview of Peterson Wealth Advisors' Q4 2023 vs. Q1 2024 Portfolio Changes
- Emerald Mutual Fund Advisers Trust Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Trust Co Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Kain Capital Expands Leadership with Marina Lee as Vice President
- Mokosak Advisory Group, LLC Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Osborn Williams & Donohoe LLC Q4 2019 vs. Q1 2020 13F Holdings Comparison
- Analyzing Oxbow Advisors' Q3 and Q4 13F Holdings: Notable Changes and New Additions in 2022