The Rise and Fall of HC Financial Advisors Inc. - A Look at Q2 2018 vs. Q3 2018 13F Holdings
Ava Hoppe | 2 May, 2023
Investing can be a risky business, but sometimes it can also be extremely rewarding. In the case of HC Financial Advisors Inc., this may not have been the case. When comparing their Q2 2018 vs. Q3 2018 13F Holdings, the results were mixed. While some investments experienced significant growth, others experienced a considerable loss.
Let's dive into the numbers and analyze what went wrong.
Starting with the winners, the top-performing investment of Q3 2018 was Huntington Bancshares Inc., which saw an increase in shares from 132,084 to 147,049 and an increase in value from $1,950,000 to $2,194,000, resulting in a growth of 12.5%. Another notable growth was reported by Automatic Data Processing Inc., which saw an increase in shares from 12,540 to 19,655 and an increase in value from $1,682,000 to $2,961,000, representing a growth of 76%.
Apart from these two investments, there were several others that showed significant growth, including Disney Walt Co., Novartis AG, Adobe Sys. Inc., and Duke Energy Corp New. However, the rest of the portfolio did not fare as well.
The biggest loser of the portfolio was Oracle Corp., which saw a decrease in shares from 51,213 to 6,635 and a decrease in value from $2,256,000 to $342,000, indicating a loss of 84.8%. Another substantial loss was reported by AT&T Inc., which saw a decrease in shares from 54,985 to 7,711 and a decrease in value from $1,766,000 to $259,000, representing a loss of 85.3%.
Apart from these two investments, several others reported losses, including International Business Machines Corp., Wells Fargo & Co New, and Exxon Mobil Corp. Overall, the portfolio saw a decrease in holdings from $53,798,000 in Q2 2018 to $40,584,000 in Q3 2018, indicating a loss of 24.5%.
Investing is all about taking risks, but it's crucial to do your research and keep an eye on your investments. For HC Financial Advisors Inc., the Q2 2018 vs. Q3 2018 13F Holdings showed some promising growth in specific investments, but the rest of the portfolio was not as successful. The key takeaway from this analysis is that it's important to diversify your holdings, keep a close eye on your investments, and be prepared for the unpredictable nature of the market.
Other Posts
- Columbus Macro, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023: A Look at the Changing Fund Holdings
- Navigating the Waters of Investment: Unison Advisors' Strategic Moves in Early 2024
- Sander Capital Advisors Inc Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- The Surprising Winners and Losers of Legacy Advisors' Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Analyzing Beutel, Goodman & Co Ltd.'s Q3 2022 vs Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison
- Quad-Cities Investment Group, LLC Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Janney Capital Management LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Oakview Capital Management, L.P.: A Look at Q3 and Q4 2022 13F Holdings
- Biltmore Wealth Management, LLC Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 - A Comprehensive Analysis of 13F Holdings Comparison
- Unveiling Strategic Shifts: A Deep Dive into Reliant Investment Management's Latest Portfolio Moves