Cedar Rock Capital Ltd Q4 2021 vs. Q1 2022 13F Holdings Comparison
Ava Hoppe | 10 May, 2023
The latest data on Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's holdings reveals some interesting shifts in their investment strategy. In this blog post, we will compare their Q4 2021 holdings to their Q1 2022 holdings and analyze the changes they made.
Procter and Gamble Co takes a Huge Hit
One of the most significant changes in Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's holdings is the complete liquidation of their shares in Procter and Gamble Co (PG). In Q4 2021, they held 6,027,405 shares of the company worth $985,963, but in Q1 2022, they sold all of them. With a change of -100%, it is clear that Cedar Rock Capital Ltd no longer sees Procter and Gamble Co as a valuable investment opportunity.
Philip Morris Intl Inc Goes Down in Smoke
Another notable change is the sale of all 7,834,495 shares of Philip Morris Intl Inc (PM) that Cedar Rock Capital Ltd held in Q4 2021. The shares were worth $744,277 at that time. In Q1 2022, they no longer had any shares in the company. This is another -100% change that indicates Cedar Rock Capital Ltd has taken a bearish stance on the tobacco giant's future prospects.
Zebra Technologies Corporati Almost Entirely Liquidated
Another company that saw a complete liquidation of Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's shares is Zebra Technologies Corporati (ZBRA). In Q4 2021, they held 871,469 shares worth $518,698. In Q1 2022, they no longer held any shares in the company. This is another -100% change in their holdings.
Small Changes in Other Holdings
Cedar Rock Capital Ltd also decreased their holdings in other significant companies, including Automatic Data Processing Inc (ADP), Starbucks Corp (SBUX), Keurig Dr Pepper Inc (KDP), and Clorox Co Del (CLX). However, these changes were not as drastic as the complete liquidation of their shares in the companies mentioned above.
Conclusion
Overall, Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's Q1 2022 13F holdings show a decisive shift in their investment strategy. With the complete liquidation of shares in three companies and a decrease in holdings across the board, it is clear that they are making some significant changes to their portfolio. It remains to be seen how these changes will affect their performance in the future.
Other Posts
- Changes in Investure, LLC's Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings: Which Companies Saw Significant Increases or Decreases in Investment?
- Energizing the Future: How Conduit Power Lit Up the Permian Basin with Clean Energy
- Seafarer Capital Partners, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023: A Deep Dive into their 13F Holdings
- Navigating a New Horizon: Citi Trends' Bold Move to Revamp Its Board for Future Success
- West Oak Capital, LLC Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Tran Capital Management, L.P. Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Frazier Healthcare Partners Promotes Shyamal Swami to Principal: Paving the Way for Continued Growth and Success in Healthcare Investments
- Investing in the Future: Analyzing Phillips Financial Management's Q3 and Q4 2022 13F Holdings
- AEGON ASSET MANAGEMENT UK Plc Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023: Analyzing Top Holdings Changes
- Wealth Alliance Advisory Group, LLC Q1 2023 vs. Q2 2023 13F Holdings Comparison