Cedar Rock Capital Ltd Q4 2021 vs. Q1 2022 13F Holdings Comparison
Ava Hoppe | 10 May, 2023
The latest data on Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's holdings reveals some interesting shifts in their investment strategy. In this blog post, we will compare their Q4 2021 holdings to their Q1 2022 holdings and analyze the changes they made.
Procter and Gamble Co takes a Huge Hit
One of the most significant changes in Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's holdings is the complete liquidation of their shares in Procter and Gamble Co (PG). In Q4 2021, they held 6,027,405 shares of the company worth $985,963, but in Q1 2022, they sold all of them. With a change of -100%, it is clear that Cedar Rock Capital Ltd no longer sees Procter and Gamble Co as a valuable investment opportunity.
Philip Morris Intl Inc Goes Down in Smoke
Another notable change is the sale of all 7,834,495 shares of Philip Morris Intl Inc (PM) that Cedar Rock Capital Ltd held in Q4 2021. The shares were worth $744,277 at that time. In Q1 2022, they no longer had any shares in the company. This is another -100% change that indicates Cedar Rock Capital Ltd has taken a bearish stance on the tobacco giant's future prospects.
Zebra Technologies Corporati Almost Entirely Liquidated
Another company that saw a complete liquidation of Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's shares is Zebra Technologies Corporati (ZBRA). In Q4 2021, they held 871,469 shares worth $518,698. In Q1 2022, they no longer held any shares in the company. This is another -100% change in their holdings.
Small Changes in Other Holdings
Cedar Rock Capital Ltd also decreased their holdings in other significant companies, including Automatic Data Processing Inc (ADP), Starbucks Corp (SBUX), Keurig Dr Pepper Inc (KDP), and Clorox Co Del (CLX). However, these changes were not as drastic as the complete liquidation of their shares in the companies mentioned above.
Conclusion
Overall, Cedar Rock Capital Ltd's Q1 2022 13F holdings show a decisive shift in their investment strategy. With the complete liquidation of shares in three companies and a decrease in holdings across the board, it is clear that they are making some significant changes to their portfolio. It remains to be seen how these changes will affect their performance in the future.
Other Posts
- Ballast, Inc. Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Shifting Holdings: A Comparison of Aviance Capital Management's Q4 2018 vs. Q1 2019
- Redhawk Wealth Advisors, Inc. Q3 2023 vs. Q4 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Adams Asset Advisors, LLC Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- Slow Capital, Inc. Q2 2023 vs. Q3 2023: An Analysis of Fund Holdings
- Alpine Investors Supports Growth of Apex Service Partners with $3.4 Billion Investment
- Shifting Strategies: Comparing Strategy Asset Managers LLC’s Q3 2022 and Q4 2022 Holdings
- Lutz Financial Services Q3/Q4 2022 13F report: Insights into stock and mutual fund holdings.
- Stengel Hill Architecture: Leading the Way in Healthcare Facility Design and Expansion
- Investment Insights: Peninsula Wealth, LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022