Columbus Macro, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023: A Look at the Changing Fund Holdings
Ava Hoppe | 6 May, 2023
Investing in the stock market can be a lucrative business, but it requires keeping up with trends and changes in the market. One source that can prove useful to investors is quarterly 13F filings, which provide detailed reports on the holdings of investment managers. In this article, we'll take a look at the Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F holdings comparison for Columbus Macro, LLC, and what changes in holdings could mean for the fund.
The Columbus Macro, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
Let's start with a brief explanation of the data in the Columbus Macro, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison. The table includes the issuer name, option type, shares held in Q4 2022 and Q1 2023, the value of these shares, and the percentage change.
The data reveals some interesting trends. For one thing, VGSH, MBB, and VYMI all saw modest increases in their shares per unit. HYDW, on the other hand, saw an impressive increase of 49.2%. Other funds that saw notable increases in share holdings include SPIB, IEFA, and SCHP with a percentage change of 52.8%, 35.4%, and 39.4% respectively.
Meanwhile, STIP, VOO, and VTI saw significant decreases in shares held, with STIP experiencing a massive percentage change of -14.9%. Other notable funds that saw decreases in share holdings are IUSV, AAPL, and PFG.
What Can These Changes in Holdings Mean?
So, what can these changes mean for the fund's performance? The answer to this question is not as straightforward as one might think. While some may argue that an increase in share holdings reflects confidence in the company's performance, others may argue that it is merely an attempt by the fund to diversify its portfolio.
It's also worth noting that these reports only provide information on a particular moment in time. Changes in holdings may have occurred before or after the reported period, so this should be taken into consideration when using this data to make investment decisions.
Conclusion
In summary, quarterly 13F filings are a valuable source of information for investors looking to stay up to date with market trends. The Columbus Macro, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison reveals that the fund has experienced both increases and decreases in share holdings. While these changes provide some insight into the fund's performance, they should not be the only basis for investment decisions. As with any investment endeavor, it is crucial to do thorough research and analysis before making any move.
Other Posts
- Investment Advisors Shuffle Holdings: Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022
- Navigating New Horizons: How The L.S. Starrett Company's Strategic Merger Spells a Future of Innovation and Growth
- Comparing Terra Nova Asset Management LLC's Q4 2022 and Q1 2023 13F Holdings: Technology Companies Dominate While Energy Struggles
- Analyzing AWM Investment Company's Holdings: Q3 and Q4 2022 Changes in Position Sizes and Values
- Crabel Capital Management, LLC Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 13F Holdings Comparison
- Revamping Forefront Analytics' Portfolio: Q3 2022 vs. Q4 2022 Comparison
- From Microsoft to Tesla: Changes Across Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 Holdings
- Cypress Wealth Services, LLC Q4 2022 vs. Q1 2023 13F Holdings Comparison
- **Navigating the Fusion of Giants: How Inrad Optics' $19 Million Journey Will Shape the Future of Tech**
- Maple Capital Management, Inc. Q3 to Q4 2022 13F Comparison: Apple and Alphabet Inc. among Top Holdings that Experienced Steep Drops in Value.